CASE LOG · FRAMEWORK INDEX
Eight skeletons, one rule for bending them
A skeleton is the three or four areas a case type usually needs and the one question each area answers. The prompt decides which skeleton to reach for; the clarifying questions decide how to bend it. The worked example below shows one bend from the workshop, then the eight skeletons follow in compact form.
Each tile opens its skeleton below: the question it answers, its areas, the prompt phrases that point to it, the numbers it usually needs, and the trap.
How the caser bent a skeleton
From the workshop: Caesars asks whether to re-sign Penn and Teller for another year at the Rio. The clarifying questions fixed the objective as total bottom-line profit and the horizon as one year. The caser bent the investment skeleton into three areas and read them in about a minute thirty. The left column is the investment or acquisition skeleton; the right column is what went on the page.
Read across then down in under two minutes
Name the areas left to right first, so the interviewer hears the whole shape before any detail. Then go down each one in bullets, not sentences. The caser spends about a minute thirty here in a real interview, and the breakout facilitators put the ceiling at two minutes. In the room, say areas or segments rather than buckets; the interview goes the way the practice went.
Current economics
What does the target earn on its own today?
Financials of the act
- Revenue from tickets: seats, capacity filled, price
- Revenue from concessions and other sources
- Revenue connected to the rest of the property: hotel, gaming
- Cost of the contract with the act
- Variable cost per show: stagehands, utilities, cleaning
- Fixed cost: marketing, SG&A
Why this shape. Revenue and cost kept in one area. The caser said splitting them is a matter of preference; one area kept the page to three columns and left room for the alternative.
The alternative
What does the same money or space earn elsewhere, once the cost of switching is counted?
Alternatives to the act
- Other shows and their profitability
- Switching costs
- Repurposing the space: hotel, gaming, arena
Why this shape. Kept short on purpose. Most of its questions mirror the first area, so the caser named only the differences and moved on. The payback arithmetic later lived here.
Risks and fit
What would change the answer: demand, people, brand, regulation?
Other considerations
- Brand, for both the casino and the act
- Whether the duo retires soon, and the need for a new act beyond the one-year window
- Customer preferences and how they are shifting
Why this shape. A catch-all for risks and benefits that do not fit the arithmetic. The last point was added just before the framework was read out, which the facilitators said is fine; a framework is a plan, not a contract.
What the prompt changed
- The one-year horizon from the clarifying questions made payback the deciding number, so the alternative area only needed one-time cost, ongoing cost and years to recover.
- The objective was purely profit, so there was no area for why the casino might prefer the other act; a second objective would have added one.
- Three areas instead of the skeleton's three-plus-risks split: risks moved into the catch-all rather than getting a column of their own.
Profitability
Why did profit change, and what would bring it back?
Revenue
Did price, volume or mix move, and when did it start?
Costs
Did fixed or variable costs move, per unit or in total?
Drivers
Is the cause the customer, a competitor or the operation itself?
Response
Which fix recovers the most profit soonest?
Market entry
Should the client enter this market, and how?
Market
Is the demand large, growing and reachable?
Economics
Does the entry pay back inside the horizon?
Ability to win
Why would customers choose the client over the incumbents?
Entry mode
Build, partner or buy?
Investment or acquisition
Is this asset, deal or contract worth the money on the client's horizon?
Current economics
What does the target earn on its own today?
The alternative
What does the same money or space earn elsewhere, once the cost of switching is counted?
Risks and fit
What would change the answer: demand, people, brand, regulation?
Pricing
What price, or pricing model, should the client set?
Customer value
What is each segment willing to pay, and what are its alternatives?
Economics
What does a unit cost, and where is break-even at each price?
Competition and rollout
How will rivals and channels react, and can the change be tested first?
New product
Should the client launch this product, and what has to be true for it to work?
Demand
Who needs it, how many, and what do they use today?
Economics
Do price, cost and volume cover the launch spend inside the horizon?
Delivery
Can the client build, sell and support it, and in what order?
Cannibalization
How much of the new volume comes out of the client's existing sales?
Operations and cost
How can the client produce more, faster or cheaper?
Process
Where is the bottleneck, and how long does each step take?
Capacity and cost
How much of the capacity is used, and what does the next unit cost?
Fix
Which lever moves the constraint: schedule, staffing, quality, outsourcing or investment?
Growth
Where should the client find profitable growth?
Core
More customers, more purchases per customer, or more per purchase?
Adjacencies
Which new segment, product, channel or geography sits closest to what the client already does?
Prioritize
Which option adds the most profit for the least capital and risk, and how soon?
Public sector or nonprofit
How does the organization deliver the most mission for the resources it has?
Objective
Which outcome is being maximized, and for whom, since it is not profit?
Resources
What funding, people and rules bound the choice?
Options and trade-offs
Which program delivers the most outcome per dollar, and who bears the cost of each choice?
Stakeholders
Who has to agree, and what would they object to?
Elsewhere on Harper
Industry lenses and the sourced word bank live in the framework and industry library. The Case atlas starts from the business problem rather than the case type, and the Case generator produces a fresh prompt to bend a skeleton against.